QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody: Which Coding Agents Is Better in 2026?
Compare pricing, features, integrations, verified reviews, AI capabilities, security, and customer satisfaction, side by side, with no marketing spin.
The Short Answer
QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody, in 15 seconds
Choose QA.tech if…
- You want deeper AI and automation features
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the lower entry price
- You need a genuinely free plan
- You have strict security & compliance needs
Head-to-Head Scorecard
How QA.tech and Sourcegraph Cody score
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 4 of 9 measured dimensions.
- Even
Customer Rating
Average score from verified user reviews
QA.techNo reviewsSourcegraphNo reviews - Even
Review Volume
Number of verified reviews, a proxy for adoption
QA.tech0Sourcegraph0 - Sourcegraph Cody
Entry Pricing
Lowest published starting price (free plan = lowest)
QA.techCustomSourcegraph$9/mo - Sourcegraph Cody
Free Access
Availability of a free plan and/or free trial
QA.techFree trialSourcegraphFree plan + trial - Even
Integrations
Number of listed third-party integrations
QA.tech6Sourcegraph6 - Even
Features
Number of listed product capabilities
QA.tech6Sourcegraph6 - QA.tech
AI Features
Capabilities mentioning AI, automation or ML
QA.tech1Sourcegraph, - Sourcegraph Cody
Security & Compliance
Number of listed compliance certifications
QA.tech1Sourcegraph2 - Sourcegraph Cody
Platforms & Deployment
Supported platforms and deployment options
QA.tech4Sourcegraph5
Feature Comparison
QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody feature breakdown
Search or filter the full feature matrix, core features, AI, integrations, APIs, security and compliance.
QA.tech
Sourcegraph CodyPricing Comparison
QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody pricing
Entry pricing, plan tiers and the cost factors that shape total cost of ownership.
QA.tech
Custom to start- Autonomous app exploration
- AI-written tests
- Email support
- Higher usage limits
- Dedicated support
- PR checks
- Everything in Pro
- SSO and admin controls
Sourcegraph Cody
$9/mo to start- Limited autocompletions and chat per month
- Choice of LLMs
- All supported IDEs
- Unlimited completions and higher chat limits
- Larger context windows
- Priority models
- Whole-codebase context
- Self-hosted or managed deployment
- Guardrails, SSO, and audit logs
Total cost of ownership factors
Beyond list price, factor in implementation, training, add-ons and per-seat scaling when estimating total cost of ownership.
Pros & Cons
QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody: strengths and trade-offs
QA.tech
Pros
- Free trial offered
- Compliance: SOC 2
- Stronger AI / automation features
- Public API available
Cons
- No free plan
- Pricing is quote-based (less transparent)
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- Free plan available
- Free trial offered
- Compliance: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR
- Public API available
Cons
Buyer Fit
Who should use QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody?
Startups
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody keeps early-stage costs lowest with its entry tier.
Small businesses
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody offers the most accessible pricing for lean teams.
Agencies
Either
Either connects to more tools for multi-client workflows.
Enterprises
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody leads on compliance and breadth for complex needs.
Ecommerce
QA.tech
QA.tech integrates with more of the commerce stack.
SaaS companies
QA.tech
QA.tech is the more developer- and automation-friendly choice.
Integration overlap
Only in QA.tech (6)
Only in Sourcegraph Cody (6)
Keep Exploring
Other alternatives worth considering
Similar coding agents products buyers compare alongside QA.tech and Sourcegraph Cody.
Ask SIA which solution fits your business
SIA, Saaskart's AI buying assistant, weighs QA.tech and Sourcegraph Cody against your team size, budget, integrations and compliance needs, then recommends the right fit and the questions to ask each vendor.
Get a personalised recommendationQA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody, Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between QA.tech and Sourcegraph Cody?
QA.tech and Sourcegraph Cody are both Coding Agents solutions. QA.tech is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users, while Sourcegraph Cody is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users. The main differences lie in pricing, features, and target audience.
Which is better, QA.tech or Sourcegraph Cody?
Based on user ratings, QA.tech scores higher at 0.0/5. The best choice depends on your team size, budget, and specific requirements.
Which is cheaper, QA.tech or Sourcegraph Cody?
Sourcegraph Cody is the more affordable option, starting at $9/month.
Does QA.tech or Sourcegraph Cody have a free plan?
Sourcegraph Cody offers a free plan. QA.tech does not have a free tier but does offer a free trial.
Can I switch from QA.tech to Sourcegraph Cody?
Switching between QA.tech and Sourcegraph Cody is possible. Both support data export. Check integration compatibility and plan for data migration to minimise disruption to your team.
Who should use QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody?
QA.tech is best suited for teams that prioritise enterprise features. Sourcegraph Cody works well for teams looking to start free and scale.
Our Verdict
The bottom line on QA.tech vs Sourcegraph Cody
Best Overall
Either
It's a tie balances user satisfaction and proven adoption.
Best for Startups
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody has the friendliest entry point for new teams.
Best for Enterprise
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody leads on compliance and feature breadth.
Best Value
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody delivers the lowest cost to get started.
Best AI Features
QA.tech
QA.tech ships more AI and automation.
Highest Rated
Either
Both earn equal user ratings.