Skip to main content

Crew Tracks vs Harvest: Which Time Tracking Is Better in 2026?

Compare pricing, features, integrations, verified reviews, AI capabilities, security, and customer satisfaction, side by side, with no marketing spin.

Rating
,
Reviews
0
From
Custom

in Time Tracking

Leads 6/9
Rating
,
Reviews
0
From
$9/mo

in Time Tracking

The Short Answer

Crew Tracks vs Harvest, in 15 seconds

Choose Crew Tracks if…

  • You prefer Crew Tracks's approach and ecosystem

Choose Harvest if…

  • You want the lower entry price
  • You need a genuinely free plan
  • You depend on a broad integration ecosystem
  • You have strict security & compliance needs

Head-to-Head Scorecard

How Crew Tracks and Harvest score

Harvest leads on 6 of 9 measured dimensions.

  • Customer Rating

    Average score from verified user reviews

    Even
    Crew
    No reviews
    Harvest
    No reviews
  • Review Volume

    Number of verified reviews, a proxy for adoption

    Even
    Crew
    0
    Harvest
    0
  • Entry Pricing

    Lowest published starting price (free plan = lowest)

    Harvest
    Crew
    Custom
    Harvest
    $9/mo
  • Free Access

    Availability of a free plan and/or free trial

    Harvest
    Crew
    Free trial
    Harvest
    Free plan + trial
  • Integrations

    Number of listed third-party integrations

    Harvest
    Crew
    6
    Harvest
    10
  • Features

    Number of listed product capabilities

    Harvest
    Crew
    8
    Harvest
    12
  • AI Features

    Capabilities mentioning AI, automation or ML

    Even
    Crew
    ,
    Harvest
    ,
  • Security & Compliance

    Number of listed compliance certifications

    Harvest
    Crew
    2
    Harvest
    3
  • Platforms & Deployment

    Supported platforms and deployment options

    Harvest
    Crew
    4
    Harvest
    7

Feature Comparison

Crew Tracks vs Harvest feature breakdown

Search or filter the full feature matrix, core features, AI, integrations, APIs, security and compliance.

Crew Tracks
Harvest
Overview
User rating
,
,
Pricing model
Quote-based
Per seat + usage
Starting price
Custom
$9/mo
Free version
Free trial
Features
Key capabilities
Crew timeDaily reportsEquipmentPayroll exportConstruction safety formsConstruction workforce+2
One-click time trackingTimers and manual entryExpense trackingInvoicing and online paymentsProject budget trackingProfitability reporting+6
AI features
,
,
Integrations & API
Integrations
ProcoreQuickBooksSage 300ViewpointFoundation SoftwareADP
AsanaTrelloSlackQuickBooksXeroStripe+4
Public API
Platforms
Deployment
CloudSaaS
CloudSaaS
Platforms
WebAPI
WebWindowsmacOSiOSAndroid
Mobile support
Security & Compliance
Compliance
SOC 2GDPR
SOC 2GDPRCCPA
Vendor
Company
,
,
Verified
Founded
,
2006
Headquarters
,
New York, New York, USA

Pricing Comparison

Crew Tracks vs Harvest pricing

Entry pricing, plan tiers and the cost factors that shape total cost of ownership.

Crew Tracks

Custom to start
ProfessionalCustom
  • daily reports
  • crew time
  • Analytics and reporting
  • Standard support
EnterpriseCustom
  • Everything in Professional
  • Dedicated support and onboarding
  • equipment
  • Advanced security and controls

Harvest

$9/mo to start
FreeFree
  • 1 seat
  • 2 projects
  • Time and expense tracking
  • Invoicing
Teams$9/month
  • Unlimited seats and projects
  • Team reporting
  • Invoicing and payments
  • Accounting integrations
Enterprise$14/month
  • Everything in Teams
  • Profitability reporting
  • Timesheet approvals
  • Activity log

Total cost of ownership factors

Free planCrew Harvest
Free trial to evaluateCrew Harvest
Transparent published pricingCrew Harvest
Public API (build vs. buy add-ons)Crew Harvest

Beyond list price, factor in implementation, training, add-ons and per-seat scaling when estimating total cost of ownership.

Pros & Cons

Crew Tracks vs Harvest: strengths and trade-offs

Crew Tracks

Pros

  • Free trial offered
  • Compliance: SOC 2, GDPR
  • Public API available

Cons

  • No free plan
  • Pricing is quote-based (less transparent)
  • Fewer native integrations than the alternative

Harvest

Pros

  • Free plan available
  • Free trial offered
  • Broad integration ecosystem (10)
  • Compliance: SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA
  • Public API available

Cons

    Buyer Fit

    Who should use Crew Tracks vs Harvest?

    Startups

    Harvest

    Harvest keeps early-stage costs lowest with its entry tier.

    Small businesses

    Harvest

    Harvest offers the most accessible pricing for lean teams.

    Agencies

    Harvest

    Harvest connects to more tools for multi-client workflows.

    Enterprises

    Harvest

    Harvest leads on compliance and breadth for complex needs.

    Ecommerce

    Harvest

    Harvest integrates with more of the commerce stack.

    SaaS companies

    Harvest

    Harvest is the more developer- and automation-friendly choice.

    Integration overlap

    Shared integrations (1)

    QuickBooks

    Only in Crew Tracks (5)

    ProcoreSage 300ViewpointFoundation SoftwareADP

    Only in Harvest (9)

    AsanaTrelloSlackXeroStripePayPalBasecampGitHubZapier

    Keep Exploring

    Other alternatives worth considering

    Similar time tracking products buyers compare alongside Crew Tracks and Harvest.

    Ask SIA which solution fits your business

    SIA, Saaskart's AI buying assistant, weighs Crew Tracks and Harvest against your team size, budget, integrations and compliance needs, then recommends the right fit and the questions to ask each vendor.

    Get a personalised recommendation

    Crew Tracks vs Harvest, Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between Crew Tracks and Harvest?

    Crew Tracks and Harvest are both Time Tracking solutions. Crew Tracks is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users, while Harvest is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users. The main differences lie in pricing, features, and target audience.

    Which is better, Crew Tracks or Harvest?

    Based on user ratings, Crew Tracks scores higher at 0.0/5. The best choice depends on your team size, budget, and specific requirements.

    Which is cheaper, Crew Tracks or Harvest?

    Harvest is the more affordable option, starting at $9/month.

    Does Crew Tracks or Harvest have a free plan?

    Harvest offers a free plan. Crew Tracks does not have a free tier but does offer a free trial.

    Can I switch from Crew Tracks to Harvest?

    Switching between Crew Tracks and Harvest is possible. Both support data export. Check integration compatibility and plan for data migration to minimise disruption to your team.

    Who should use Crew Tracks vs Harvest?

    Crew Tracks is best suited for teams that prioritise enterprise features. Harvest works well for teams looking to start free and scale.

    Our Verdict

    The bottom line on Crew Tracks vs Harvest

    Best Overall

    Either

    It's a tie balances user satisfaction and proven adoption.

    Best for Startups

    Harvest

    Harvest has the friendliest entry point for new teams.

    Best for Enterprise

    Harvest

    Harvest leads on compliance and feature breadth.

    Best Value

    Harvest

    Harvest delivers the lowest cost to get started.

    Best AI Features

    Either

    Comparable AI capabilities on both sides.

    Highest Rated

    Either

    Both earn equal user ratings.

    Ready to decide between Crew Tracks and Harvest?

    Get a recommendation

    Not sure which to choose?

    Tell us your requirements and our advisors will help you compare and shortlist the best-fit options, free and unbiased.

    • A real human, fast

      Someone on our team replies within one business day, no bots, no ticket queue.

    • Routed to the right team

      Buying, selling, partnering, or investing, you reach the people who can actually help.

    • Independent & unbiased

      No pushy sales. Just honest guidance grounded in the ecosystem.

    • Tailored to your context

      Tell us what you need and we shape the next steps around it.

    Replies within 1 business day No spam, ever Free to reach out
    1. 1You
    2. 2Details
    3. 3Contact

    Who are you? Pick the option that fits best.